Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORS
  • SUBMISSION
    • Online Submission
    • Author Instructions
  • ISSUE
    • Current
    • Early Online
    • Archives
  • PERMISSIONS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
Home
 / 
Original Article
 / 
Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study

September 9, 2020
Original Article

Does Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis induce myelosuppression in primary immune deficiency disease patients; A retrospective, 3 groups comparative study

Reem Elajez,1 Sabha Nisar,1 Mehdi Adeli1,2,3

Affiliations:
1 Hamad Medical Corporation
2 Sidra Medical and Research Center
3 Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar

Abstract

Background: The possible myelosuppression side effect of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) on primary immune deficiency (PID) patients has not been established yet.
Objective: Identify if the PID patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to the use of TMP-SMX.
Method: Retrospective, three groups study, of PID patients (on and off TMP-SMX prophylaxis) and urinary tract infection (UTI) patients received prophylaxis TMP-SMX. Data about CBC results (WBC, ANC, Lymphocytes, RBC, Hemoglobin, and Platelet counts) at baseline, first, and maximum myelosuppression observed during the period of TMP-SMX administration were collected.
Results: A total of 122 patients were included in this study (41 PID patients on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, 45 PID patients not on TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 36 UTI patients on prophylaxis TMP-SMX). There are significant differences noticed in the percentage of patients who developed clinical myelosuppression (i.e. less than normal value for age) in ANC (39.0% vs. 8.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), RBC (36.6% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.014), WBC (41.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.003), and platelet (24.4% vs. 15.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.028) in group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant difference in myelosuppression between the groups was most likely due to the combination of TMP-SMX effect on PID patients rather than the disease or the drug itself.
Conclusion: Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients are at higher risk of developing myelosuppression secondary to TMP-SMX prophylaxis (especially ANC) comparing to immune-competent patients or other PID patients who did not receive prophylactic TMP-SMX. Future larger prospective study is required to confirm this association.
Key words: TMP-SMX, myelosuppression, primary immune deficiency, prophylaxis, Neutropenia

Full Text
Vol. 41, No. 4
myelosuppression, Neutropenia, primary immune deficiency, prophylaxis, TMP-SMX

Categories

  • Announcement (1)
  • Case Report (23)
  • Early Online (93)
  • Original Article (223)
  • Review Article (29)

Key words

allergen Allergic rhinitis Allergy Anaphylaxis Asthma atopic dermatitis child Children Chlorhexidine chronic rhinosinusitis chronic spontaneous urticaria Chronic Urticaria COVID-19 cytokine depression diagnosis drug allergy Drug hypersensitivity efficacy Epidemiology food allergy Food hypersensitivity house dust mite IgE Immunotherapy obstructive sleep apnea Omalizumab prevalence primary immunodeficiency Quality of life Questionnaire Reliability risk factor risk factors safety SARS-CoV-2 Sensitization Severe asthma Skin prick test Specific IgE Thai treatment urticaria vaccine Vitamin D
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

Support Contact

Managing Editor
Ms. Patrawadee Pitakpolrat
E-mail: managingeditor@apjai-journal.org

Production Editor
Ms. Chanita Jangsawang
E-mail: chanita.j@apjai-journal.org

Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology © 2025 All rights reserved.
All rights reserved | Privacy Policy