Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORS
  • SUBMISSION
    • Online Submission
    • Author Instructions
  • ISSUE
    • Current
    • Early Online
    • Archives
  • PERMISSIONS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
Home
 / 
Original Article
 / 
Field sting reactions in patients receiving Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: real-life experience

March 14, 2022
Original Article

Field sting reactions in patients receiving Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: real-life experience

Zeynep Çelebi Sözener,1 Reşat Kendirlinan,1 Pamir Çerçi,1 Ömür Aydın,1 Dilşad Mungan,1 Sevim Bavbek,1
Yavuz Demirel,1 Zeynep Mısırlıgil,1 Betül Ayşe Sin1

Affiliation:
1 Department of Chest Diseases, Division of Immunology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Background: Hymenoptera stings can cause systemic allergic reactions (SARs) that are prevented by venom immunotherapy (VIT). Sting challenge tests or field stings are used to evaluate the outcome of VIT.
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the consequences of field stings in patients during or after completion of VIT, and to identify patients at higher risk.
Methods: Patients treated with VIT between 1995 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Contacted patients were invited to the clinic and a questionnaire was conducted regarding the history of field stings.
Results: A total of 115 patients (F/M: 45/70, mean age: 38.5 ± 12 years) treated with VIT were included; 74/115 were contacted and asked about field stings after VIT cessation. A history of 73 field stings was reported in 38 patients, 25 of whom were treated with honeybee venom and 13 with common wasp venom. Eighteen of the reactions were SARs [8 with honeybees (1 grade-I, 6 grade-II, 1 grade-III) and 10 with common wasps (1 grade-I, 5 grade-II, 4 grade-III)]. There was no association between the severity of index reactions and field stings with either the honeybee or common wasp. The median duration of VIT was longer in patients showing no reaction than in patients with an SAR. Of the 7 patients on ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers, 1 asthmatic patient developed grade-II SAR due to field stings in the first year of VIT.
Conclusion: This study confirms that VIT lasting at least 3 years is effective in preventing SARs after field stings.
Key words: honeybee venom, common wasp venom, insect allergy, immunotherapy, sting reactions, field sting, systemic allergic reaction, local allergic reaction, adverse effects, ACE inhibitor, severity of index reaction

Full Text
Vol. 41, No. 3
ACE inhibitor, adverse effects, common wasp venom, field sting, honeybee venom, Immunotherapy, Insect allergy, local allergic reaction, severity of index reaction, sting reactions, systemic allergic reaction

Categories

  • Announcement (1)
  • Case Report (23)
  • Early Online (93)
  • Original Article (223)
  • Review Article (29)

Key words

allergen Allergic rhinitis Allergy Anaphylaxis Asthma atopic dermatitis child Children Chlorhexidine chronic rhinosinusitis chronic spontaneous urticaria Chronic Urticaria COVID-19 cytokine depression diagnosis drug allergy Drug hypersensitivity efficacy Epidemiology food allergy Food hypersensitivity house dust mite IgE Immunotherapy obstructive sleep apnea Omalizumab prevalence primary immunodeficiency Quality of life Questionnaire Reliability risk factor risk factors safety SARS-CoV-2 Sensitization Severe asthma Skin prick test Specific IgE Thai treatment urticaria vaccine Vitamin D
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

Support Contact

Managing Editor
Ms. Patrawadee Pitakpolrat
E-mail: managingeditor@apjai-journal.org

Production Editor
Ms. Chanita Jangsawang
E-mail: chanita.j@apjai-journal.org

Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology © 2025 All rights reserved.
All rights reserved | Privacy Policy