Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORS
  • SUBMISSION
    • Online Submission
    • Author Instructions
  • ISSUE
    • Current
    • Early Online
    • Archives
  • PERMISSIONS
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
Home
 / 
Original Article
 / 
The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the asthma control test

December 11, 2020
Original Article

The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the asthma control test

Nutchanok Niyatiwatchanchai, Warawut Chaiwong, Chaicharn Pothirat

Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Abstract

Background: The Asthma Control Test (ACT) has been widely used for the assessment of asthma control. However, it has never been validated in adult Thai asthmatic patients.
Objective: To determine the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the ACT in adult Thai asthmatic patients.
Methods: Any correlation between ACT and level of asthma controlled was determined using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The ACT was carried out at 2 visits to a physician (4-12 weeks apart) to ascertain the level of reliability. Discriminant validity was determined using an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) to identify the optimum cut-off point of the levels of control.
Results: Seventy-one asthmatic adult patients, 40 (56.3%) female with a mean age of 54.2 ± 14.7 years were enrolled. The Thai version of ACT showed an acceptable internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75. Test-retest reliability was 0.82. There was a significant correlation between the ACT scores and GINA symptom control tool (r = 0.87, p < 0.001). An ACT ≤ 22 was used to screen “not well-controlled” asthma with a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 93.0% and an ACT score ≤ 19 was used to screen “uncontrolled” asthma.
Conclusion: The Thai version of ACT is valid and a reliable tool for use in adult Thai asthmatic patients. However, the cut off points of ACT for levels of control should be changed to 22 and 19 for differentiation between well vs. partly controlled and partly vs. uncontrolled asthma, respectively.
Key words: asthma, control, validation, reliability, Thai,

Full Text
Vol. 42, No. 1
Asthma, control, Reliability, Thai, Validation

Categories

  • Announcement (1)
  • Case Report (23)
  • Early Online (93)
  • Original Article (223)
  • Review Article (29)

Key words

allergen Allergic rhinitis Allergy Anaphylaxis Asthma atopic dermatitis child Children Chlorhexidine chronic rhinosinusitis chronic spontaneous urticaria Chronic Urticaria COVID-19 cytokine depression diagnosis drug allergy Drug hypersensitivity efficacy Epidemiology food allergy Food hypersensitivity house dust mite IgE Immunotherapy obstructive sleep apnea Omalizumab prevalence primary immunodeficiency Quality of life Questionnaire Reliability risk factor risk factors safety SARS-CoV-2 Sensitization Severe asthma Skin prick test Specific IgE Thai treatment urticaria vaccine Vitamin D
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology

Support Contact

Managing Editor
Ms. Patrawadee Pitakpolrat
E-mail: managingeditor@apjai-journal.org

Production Editor
Ms. Chanita Jangsawang
E-mail: chanita.j@apjai-journal.org

Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology © 2025 All rights reserved.
All rights reserved | Privacy Policy